The tax rates for online gambling are literally and figuratively all over the map as jurisdictions across the United States move to approve, regulate – and profit from – mobile/online wagering.

As 2020 begins, there are only three states – Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey – with regulated online betting on slots, poker, and table games. Nine states across the country, including PA and NJ, have online sports betting.

Here, we break down the various state tax rates for online gambling and discuss the implications of the vast range that exists across markets.

Online casino rates all over the map

Tax rates for online casino operations run from as low as 15% in New Jersey, the top revenue generator, to the 62.5% found in Delaware. That number comes from totaling the state’s cut, referred to as “revenue sharing” in DE, plus a 12.5% state vendor fee.

Pennsylvania took a different approach, varying tax rates depending on the vertical. PA’s rates are 54% for online slots, but 16% for online poker and online table games.

StateOnline Tax Rates
Delaware62.5%* (50%+12.5%**)
New Jersey15%
Pennsylvania54% (slots); 16% (poker & table games)

*These rates apply after the initial $3.75 million in revenue all goes to the state.

**50% goes to revenue sharing with the state and an additional 12.5% to the state vendor.

Online sportsbook rates run the gamut

Online sportsbook rates vary even more widely across the nine states with mobile sports wagering operational. Those states are:

  • Nevada
  • New Jersey
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • West Virginia
  • Oregon
  • Iowa
  • Indiana
  • New Hampshire

The lowest tax rate among the online sportsbook jurisdictions is 6.75%, the rate employed in Nevada and Iowa.

The highest, Rhode Island, comes in at a staggering 83% when adding the 51% revenue sharing amount and the 32% cut for the state’s vendor.

Delaware comes in second-highest with its 62.5% tax rate set for online casino.

States with Online SportsbooksTax Rate
West Virginia10%
New Jersey13% (casino-based); 14.25% (racetrack-based)
New Hampshire51% (revenue share)
Rhode Island83%**
OregonNot disclosed

*Includes 50% revenue share with the state plus 12.5% to the state vendor

**Includes 51% revenue share with the state plus 32% to the state vendor

Pitfalls of high taxes on online gambling

Nevada was the lone state with full-fledged sports betting prior to the 2018 overturning of PASPA that opened the way for other states to join in. Their reasonable 6.75% tax rate across the board has stood the test of time.

While states like New Jersey, Iowa, and Indiana have followed suit with operator-friendly tax rates, others have clearly opted for a different strategy – to their detriment.

The American Gaming Association (AGA) believes setting tax rates too high to foster competition in the market makes it difficult to compete against illegal gambling operations. The AGA tracks tax rates across the country in the organization’s annual State of the State’s report.

“To compete with the illegal market, states must implement sensible policies – including tax rates and licensing fees – that enable a seamless shift to safer alternatives for consumers,” said Casey Clark, the AGA’s senior vice president, strategic communications.

Market saturation is changing the gambling business

There is a longstanding tendency by governments to treat gambling taxation as an elastic cash cow, shifting program funding from a state’s voting constituents to outsider companies.

That may have worked when gambling was relatively new, but with the increasing competition in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic gambling markets, high taxation in certain states has caused issues.

The high online tax rates in Pennsylvania come up when discussing the slowed rate of gambling market growth in the state. The huge 54% slot rate likely in large part explains why there are still just five online slot operators in a state as large and populous as Pennsylvania, with its nearly 13 million residents.

The other factor holding back expansion is likely PA’s decision to require computer servers to be housed within the borders of the Keystone State. This regulation stems from an early 2019 DOJ Wire Act opinion that has been taken at face value by the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, even as other states attribute little weight to the interpretation.

With online casino growth left wanting, PA’s online sportsbook market has proven more appealing for operators, despite the hefty 36% tax rate on revenue.

Online sportsbook expansion is ‘hot’

There are currently eight online sportsbooks in PA with more expected to launch in the near future.

Pennsylvania’s online sports betting market has several factors working to their benefit.

Joe Bertolone, the executive director of the International Center for Gaming at the University of Nevada Las Vegas, said online sportsbook growth, even in high tax jurisdictions such as PA, will continue to drive expansion and innovation simply because that niche is considered “hot.”

Despite the high tax rate, the PA market is a “must” for operators due to the size of the state’s population of close to 13 million, added Bertolone.

“You’ve got to be there,” he said of PA.

Claim Your $1,200 Bonus at DraftKings Sportsbook
Up to $1,200 BONUS
New User Bonus. T&Cs Apply.
DraftKings Promo: Bet $5 Win $150
PLUS $50 Bonus Bet On Deposit
PLUS Up to $1,000 Deposit Bonus
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER 
To Claim: Click Play Now

Small market states feel negative effects of high tax rates

Smaller markets like Delaware and Rhode Island don’t carry the same draw for potential operators. The impact of high tax rates is magnified in these states, which can be further constrained by local law.

While “The First State” was indeed the first in the country to offer a form of legal online casino, revenues from online gambling have underwhelmed to date. In addition to a small population of around 1 million, Delaware is constrained by a law that allows for just three online casino operators, one for each land-based casino.

All three brands operate on one single platform run by 888 Holdings. Competition in the DE market, therefore, is lacking.

The first state (besides Nevada) to launch legal retail sports betting, Delaware is still limited to land-based wagering at their three casinos plus state lottery retailers which can accept parlays of three teams or more.

The state lottery runs Rhode Island‘s only legal online sportsbook, and it has limited features and offers no bonus incentives.

Both states have traditionally treated gambling operations like a goose with limitless gold eggs. But they may soon be forced to change with the times.

Competition necessitates adjustments

After being out ahead of the curve when it comes to offering legal gambling, Delaware seems to be falling behind in adjusting to the post-PASPA era of online wagering.

Between its three casino sportsbooks and lottery retailers, DE brought in $132.5 million in handle for the year 2019, $19.5 million being revenue.

A look at year-on-year figures from 2018 to 2019 in the popular betting month of November, Delaware saw a significant 46% drop in handle while revenue was stagnant at $1.3 million.

With competition in surrounding states increasing, gambling revenues in Rhode Island have also disappointed of late. The Providence Journal reported in November that the state would claim less than $10 million in revenue for sports betting for 2019. That’s less than half of the $22.7 million projected in profit.

The state also now expects only $105 million in handle via the state’s new mobile app, just a fraction of the $595 million assumed in prior projections.

Will high online tax rates survive?

Bertolone has cautioned that expansion is dynamic, and markets will continue to feel the “ripple” as saturation is reached.

And yet, just like Delaware, Rhode Island’s tax rate remains in the stratosphere. PA’s rates likewise leave something to be desired, especially for potential online casino operators.

Whether states will make changes to online gambling tax rates perceived by many to be unsustainable or stunting growth of the market remains to be seen.